Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

µÎºÎ ¹æ»ç¼± ±Ô°Ý»çÁø ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ ºÐ¼®±âÀÇ ½Å·Úµµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A STUDY ON RELIABILITY OF COMPUTERIZED CEPHALOMETRIC ANALYSIS SYSTEM

´ëÇѱ¸°­³»°úÇÐȸÁö 1994³â 19±Ç 2È£ p.47 ~ 56
¹®È￱, ±èº´±¹, ±èÀçÇü, Á¤ÀºÈñ, ÀÌÀ¯°æ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹®È￱ (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­Áø´Ü
±èº´±¹ (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­Áø´Ü
±èÀçÇü (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­Áø´Ü
Á¤ÀºÈñ (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­Áø´Ü
ÀÌÀ¯°æ (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­Áø´Ü

Abstract


To investigate the reliability and reproducibility of the computerized cephalometric analysis system, we compared the differences of the 10 linear and 12 angular measurements by manual works and the use of computerized cephalometric analysis system.
\Ve obtained as follows
1. There was not signicant difference between mean values of 2manual and computerized measurements. 2. There was not s;,^,nicant difference between mean differences of manual and computerized cephalometric
analysis data taken by same examiner except facial depth, facial length and posterior facial height.
3. There was not signicant difference between mean differences_ of two trials of the computerized cephalomehic
analysis data by same examiner in all measurements.
4. There was not signicant difference between mean differences of the computerized cephalometric analysis data by two examiners except FMIA and PAPA.
According to this result, we guess "the use of computerized cephalometric analysis system is useful on diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontic patients.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI